MAPK/phosphatase interactions

From Yeast Pheromone Model

Jump to: navigation, search

Back to main model page



Contents

Ptp2/Ptp3 dephosphrylation of MAPK

  • A mammalian MAPK (ERK2) is protected from dephosphorylation while bound to at least one of it's substrates. Wang et al. 2002 PMID 12056917
  • Tyrosine dephosphorylation of Fus3 is primarily regulated by Ptp3. Zhan et al. 1997 PMID 9224718
    • In the presence of pheromone, Ptp2 deletion only has a detectable effect when combined with Ptp3 deletion (measure by the amount of tyrosine-phosphorylated Fus3, and Fus3 activity).

Reaction Definition

We will lump Ptp2 and Ptp3 together into one species, Ptp, since we are not treating the cytoplasm and nucleus as separate compartments. Assumptions:

  • The phosphatases bind Fus3 and Kss1 competitively with the MAPK's other binding partners, so the phosphatases can only bind free Fus3 and Kss1.
  • Ptp can only bind Fus3 or Kss1 molecules that are phosphorylated on the tyrosine residue on the activation loop, and they bind independently of phopsohrylation on the threonine residue.
  • Ptp binds and dephosphorylates Fus3 and Kss1 with equal efficiency
Ptp(MAPK_site) + Fus3(docking_site, Y182~PO4) <-> Ptp(MAPK_site!1).Fus3(docking_site!1, Y182~PO4)

Ptp(MAPK_site) + Kss1(docking_site, Y185~PO4) <-> Ptp(MAPK_site!1).Kss1(docking_site!1, Y185~PO4)


Ptp(MAPK_site!1).Fus3(docking_site!1, Y182~PO4) -> Ptp(MAPK_site) + Fus3(docking_site, Y182~none)

Ptp(MAPK_site!1).Kss1(docking_site!1, Y185~PO4) -> Ptp(MAPK_site) + Kss1(docking_site, Y185~none)


Msg5 dephosphorylation of MAPK

  • Msg5 is a dual-specificity phosphatase. Doi et al. 1994 PMID 8306972
    • Msg5 contains sequence homology the conserved active site of protein tyrosine phosphatases, as well as a C-terminal sequence that is homologous to a dual-specificity phosphatase.
    • In vitro, Msg5 is able to dephosphorylate phospho-serine, phospho-threonine, and phospho-tyrosine on Fus3.
  • Msg5 downregulates Fus3 activity, but not Ste7. Doi et al. 1994 PMID 8306972
    • Disruption of Msg5 greatly increases the activity of Fus3 that is isolated from vegetatively and pheromone-treated cells.
    • Disruption of Msg5 does not affect the activity of Ste7 that is isolated from vegetatively and pheromone-treated cells.
  • A mammalian MAPK (ERK2) is protected from dephosphorylation while bound to at least one of its substrates. Wang et al. 2002 PMID 12056917
  • The dual specificity phosphatase MKP3 has a Kd = 0.17 μM for unphosphorylated ERK2. Zhou et al. 2001 PMID 11104775
  • Based on initial rates of release of radioactive phosphate, the dual specificity phosphatase MKP3 has the following kinetic parameters for ERK2: (Zhao & Zhang. 2001 PMID 11432864)
Km (phosphatase MKP3) kcat (phosphatase MKP3)
ERK2/pTpY 0.022 ± 0.005 μM 0.084 ± 0.009 s-1
ERK2/pY 0.034 ± 0.004 μM 0.108 ± 0.004 s-1
ERK2/pT 0.018 ± 0.005 μM 0.060 ± 0.006 s-1
  • MKP3 appears to dephospohrylate ERK2 via an ordered distributive mechnism, dephosphorylating tyrosine residue before the threonine residue. Zhao & Zhang. 2001 PMID 11432864
  • Fus3 binds a peptide with the MAPK consensus binding motif from Msg5 (residues 23-37; PRSLQNRNTKNLSLD) with a Kd = 2 ± 0.5 μM. Remenyi et al. 2005 PMID 16364919
  • Kss1 binds a peptide with the MAPK consensus binding motif from Msg5 (residues 23-37; PRSLQNRNTKNLSLD) with a Kd = 0.8 ± 0.15 μM (measurements made by competition fluorescence polarizing assay). Remenyi et al. 2005 PMID 16364919
  • Fus3's dephosphorylation by Msg5 is at least partially dependent on docking site/docking groove interactions. Remenyi et al. 2005 PMID 16364914
    • Mutation of the Fus3 docking grove elimintates its in vitro dephosphorylation by Msg5, though this mutant is still efficiently dephosphorylated by λ-phosphatase, which is known to not require substrate docking.

Reaction Definition

MKP3 binds ERK2 with near equal affinity when ERK2 is in any of its phopsohrylated states, and binds it ~10-fold more weakly when ERK2 is not phosphoryated. MKP3 also appears to dephosphorylate ERK2 with equal efficiency when ERK2 is in any of its phopsohrylated states. We will thus assume that Msg5 has equal affinity and activity on all phosphorylated forms of Fus3 and Kss1, and does not bind the unphosphorylated forms of the MAPKs. Thus, based on the binding of Fus3 and Kss1 to the MAPK binding motif from Msg5, Kd_Msg5_MAPK = 1.4 μM. Also, we will assume that Msg5 acts in an ordered distributive mechanism (as MPK3 does), by first dephosphorylating tyrosine, and then threonine.

Assumptions:

  • Msg5 binds Fus3 and Kss1 competitively with their other binding partners, so Msg5 can only bind free Fus3 and Kss1.
  • Msg5 binds and dephosphorylates Fus3 and Kss1 with equal efficiency
Msg5(MAPK_site) + Fus3(docking_site, T180~PO4, Y182~none) <-> 
   Msg5(MAPK_site!1).Fus3(docking_site!1, T180~PO4, Y182~none)

Msg5(MAPK_site) + Fus3(docking_site, T180~none, Y182~PO4) <-> 
    Msg5(MAPK_site!1).Fus3(docking_site!1, T180~none, Y182~PO4)

Msg5(MAPK_site) + Fus3(docking_site, T180~PO4, Y182~PO4) <-> 
    Msg5(MAPK_site!1).Fus3(docking_site!1, T180~PO4, Y182~PO4)

Msg5(MAPK_site) + Kss1(docking_site, T183~PO4, Y185~none) <-> 
    Msg5(MAPK_site!1).Kss1(docking_site!1, T183~PO4, Y185~none)

Msg5(MAPK_site) + Kss1(docking_site, T183~none, Y185~PO4) <-> 
    Msg5(MAPK_site!1).Kss1(docking_site!1, T183~none, Y185~PO4)

Msg5(MAPK_site) + Kss1(docking_site, T183~PO4, Y185~PO4) <-> 
    Msg5(MAPK_site!1).Kss1(docking_site!1, T183~PO4, Y185~PO4)


Msg5(MAPK_site!1).Fus3(docking_site!1, Y182~PO4) -> 
   Msg5(MAPK_site) + Fus3(docking_site, Y182~none)

Msg5(MAPK_site!1).Fus3(docking_site!1, T180~PO4, Y182~none) -> 
    Msg5(MAPK_site) + Fus3(docking_site, T180~none, Y182~none)

Msg5(MAPK_site!1).Kss1(docking_site!1, Y185~PO4) -> 
    Msg5(MAPK_site) + Kss1(docking_site, Y185~none)

Msg5(MAPK_site!1).Kss1(docking_site!1, T183~PO4, Y185~none) -> 
    Msg5(MAPK_site) + Kss1(docking_site, T183~none, Y185~none)

Personal tools